theperfectvef.blogg.se

1. AI SUITE VS AMD RYZEN MASTER MANUAL
2. AI SUITE VS AMD RYZEN MASTER FULL
3. AI SUITE VS AMD RYZEN MASTER WINDOWS 10

The pricey Godlike board retails for around $800, but has the 14+4+1-phase power delivery subsystem to support aggressive overclocking.ġ. We're using MSI's MEG X570 Godlike as our test platform for the second- and third-gen AMD processors. The test also outputs deviation metrics that help ensure accuracy in our test results.We've integrated key tests, like GIMP productivity, web browser benchmarks, SVT-AV1 encoding, NAMD, and the build-llvm compile test. While this suite is heavily focused on Linux test environments, the benchmark utility does have several powerful testing options for Windows systems, along with Apple OS X, GNU Hurd, Solaris, and BSD operating systems. We added in several new tests from Phornix's open-source benchmark suite. AMD has added hardware-based mitigations for both variants of Spectre, which should reduce the performance impact, but the requisite patches for both companies have performance penalties, which are reflected here in our testing.

Intel is currently impacted by Spectre, Spectre v4, Meltdown, Foreshadow, Spectre v3a, Lazy FPU, Spoiler, and MDS, while AMD is only impacted by Spectre and Spectre v4. All of our test results come from the aforementioned operating system and include all publicly available security mitigations and the latest motherboard firmware revisions.

AI SUITE VS AMD RYZEN MASTER WINDOWS 10

As such, we updated our test image to the latest version of Windows 10 available (18362.207). The new AMD-optimized Windows scheduler is only present in Windand promises to expose gains in several types of applications. In most cases, the feature has no observable impact. Unfortunately, we've found that the PBO+AOC feature often comes at the expense of performance in single-threaded workloads even though it is billed as retaining, and even heightening, single-core boost clocks.

AI SUITE VS AMD RYZEN MASTER FULL

As we've found in the past, AMD's stock coolers tend to extract most of the full benefit.

Unfortunately, PBO gains are slight (don't expect miracles), but it is worthwhile if you have adequate cooling. The feature also keeps the Ryzen processor in its power-to-performance sweet spot, which means that it doesn't require much additional power consumption or cooling.

AI SUITE VS AMD RYZEN MASTER MANUAL

In other words, outside of a few edge cases, like systems that will only do heavily-threaded work, manual overclocking simply isn't worth your time - or the egregious power consumption it requires for relatively small performance gains.Īs we've seen, AMD’s PBO algorithms provide a speedup that improves threaded performance while preserving the single-core boost frequency. We've tested several of the Ryzen 3000 processors in manually-overclocked configurations, and the results are predictable: You gain some extra threaded performance over automatic overclocking with PBO, but lose too much performance in lightly-threaded apps to make it worthwhile.